![Image: Shutterstock Image: Shutterstock](/images/transform/v1/crop/frm/180164150/4cf5c270-26d3-44d1-a1f8-ce87feda17d5.jpg/r0_256_5000_3078_w1200_h678_fmax.jpg)
Adaptation, mitigation, and negotiation will be on the agenda as the world gathers in Sharm el-Sheikh for the 27th Conference of the Parties (COP) climate meeting on November 6.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
or signup to continue reading
When the world's leaders convene in Egypt's Sharm el-Sheikh for the 27th Conference of Parties, they will do so under very different circumstances to last year's COP26 in Glasgow.
Crises have erupted over the past 12 months: the invasion of Ukraine, energy and food shortages, and global economic instability and price inflation. The pledges of COP26 are colliding with the realities of governments focusing on their narrower domestic agenda. It is a much changed and more troubled world.
In addition, countries have experienced extreme climate change events over the last year including the floods in Pakistan, hurricanes in the United States, and a US$20 billion drought in Europe. All requiring immediate attention and action.
It is an urgency recognised by Egypt's foreign minister, Sameh Shoukry, who will chair COP27.
"If countries are to backtrack or deviate from their commitments, and their efforts to maintain those agreements and understandings made in Paris and Glasgow, we will be on track to have over 2°C and maybe up to 3.6°C, according to the science available," he said recently.
"These are contradictions and everybody has to be serious in dealing with those contradictions."
Developing economies, especially those low-emitting countries in the Pacific, are feeling the brunt of climate change and asking wealthy nations to pay proportionately for their contribution and responsibility for accelerating global warming.
But global loss and damage funding has failed to pick up steam (especially with other more pressing demands for national financial help), forcing COP27 to consider a different approach - debt cancellation.
Looming over these negotiations are two superpowers at inflection points. The United States, on the doorstep of mid-term elections, looking to continue the momentum of their historic Inflation Reduction Act. China, fresh off its historic National People's Congress.
Last year, the two countries stunned the world by announcing a bilateral agreement. However, following a rocky year, ignited by US House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's visit to Taiwan, the future of climate collaboration between the US and China is much less certain.
Will the discord give an opportunity for new players to assert themselves in global climate talks? Will the change of government in Australia spark enthusiasm for its hopes to host an upcoming COP with the Pacific nations? And will the host country, Egypt, keen to make the most of an African-based COP, forge a new narrative for its ambitious allies to have an increased say on how the world moves forward on climate.
Who will attend?
One hundred and ninety-eight countries will be represented at COP27, all signatories to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.
Global energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rose by six percent in 2021 to 36.3 billion tonnes, the largest absolute increase in recorded history.
To reach the preferable international target of 1.5°C global warming, global emissions must be halved by 2030.
Australian National University's Frank Jotzo said the "most contentious issue" in climate negotiations is money.
IN OTHER NEWS:
"It is accepted that rich countries need to help the developing world financially to reduce emissions and deal with climate change. How and how much has been a big topic in climate negotiations for decades.
"But developing economies do not see money flowing their way at anywhere near the scale needed."
Mr Jotzo said last year's COP decided that countries that had not yet updated their 2030 emissions targets should do so by now.
"But only few have done so, and the overall strength of pledges remains insufficient."
ANU's Melanie Pill said a "cruelty of climate change" is that the countries most immediately suffering its consequences are low-emissions states that least contributed to it.
"These countries - Small Island Developing states, coastal regions like Bangladesh or archipelagos such as Indonesia - are developing economies, whose progress continues to be blasted backwards by floods, cyclones, rising seas and droughts."
- Originally published under Creative Commons by 360info.