A corruption watchdog has taken aim at the Queensland government, calling proposed changes that will restrict its reports "very troubling".
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
or signup to continue reading
Queensland's Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) chair said the watchdog had been hamstrung for almost a year after a High Court ruling prevented the release of a prominent report.
Bruce Barbour on Friday said it had been frustrating waiting months for the state government to introduce proposed law changes that will reinstate the watchdog's reporting powers.
But Mr Barbour said the commission would still be hampered by new legislation ushered in by an independent review, as it would block a long-awaited report on former deputy premier Jackie Trad.
He called for a rigorous parliamentary committee assessment of the proposed changes, saying the review's recommendations were not appropriate and "very troubling".
"We believe they're inconsistent with the public interest and we don't support them," he told a budget estimates hearing on Friday.
All 16 recommendations of former chief justice Catherine Holmes' CCC review were accepted by the Queensland government when her report was released in May.
The review was launched after a 2023 High Court decision ruled a commission report on former public trustee Peter Carne was not subject to parliamentary privilege and could not be released.
An appeal was dismissed, ensuring the commission was not able to release other reports including one involving Ms Trad.
The Queensland government is yet to usher in new legislation after accepting the Holmes review's recommendations.
Those recommendations include giving the commission powers to release public reports retrospectively, provided they satisfied specific criteria.
But Mr Barbour said even if the laws change, reports on Mr Carne and Ms Trad could not be publicly released as neither had been prepared under the review's recommendations.
He said the watchdog would continue to be hampered by the recommendation's "specific criteria" which may restrict reports containing negative opinions on public officials.
"We can't effectively ... fulfill our obligations ... (or) give confidence to the community, to parliament ... if prohibited from making negative public reports that contain commentary, that contain opinion, that contain recommendations," he said.
Mr Barbour said under the Holmes review model, damning reports with significant recommendations, like an Ipswich City Council probe that led to 15 people being charged, would not have been possible.
Attorney-General Yvette D'Ath agreed the watchdog required powers to report but said those powers also came with responsibility.
"That means there has to be parameters around that reporting power like every other jurisdiction in this country," she told the estimates hearing.
"Every other crime and corruption body has regulation and a framework around reporting, not just an open blanket."
Australian Associated Press
